At last ITGOA took the pain to inform the members about the situation. The division of ITGOA could not be kept under cover and the leadership had to admit it.
"But it has to be pointed out that the same tune and texture of harmony has not been prevailing among the entire cross‐section of its members across the country, at least in the issue of implementation of NRP Judgment and the promotions in the cadre of ACIT"
Regarding promotion from ITO to ACIT :
"As per the sanction given by the Hon’ble FM, the proposal for DPC for the R.Y. 2014‐15 was revised and the proposal for promoting 200 officers was sent to UPSC by the CBDT on 10‐12‐2015 which is still pending. Though the CHQ is pursuing the matter on a day‐to‐day basis since then and the O.P.Sinha Committee is putting its best efforts to convince the UPSC for holding the DPC early, I am sorry to say that a series of Court cases filed by our members for immediate revision of the All India Seniority List of ITOs as per the decision of Hon’ble SC in the case of NR Parmar and others, are creating hurdles before the UPSC in declaring the date of DPC."
Regarding Ad-hoc promotion :
"Also, the MP & CG Units has written a letter to the CHQ on 20‐01‐2016 expressing the frustration of its members and requesting the CHQ to impress upon the CBDT for holding DPCs for Ad‐hoc promotion in the cadre of ACIT. The NWR Unit has also expressed the same opinion through its letter dated 25‐01‐2016. Though the CHQ appreciates the sentiment of the members of the MP & CG Unit and the NWR region, and for that matter, the frustration of the entire membership all over the country, the decision of ad‐hoc promotion cannot be taken by the CHQ alone. We are enclosing herewith the copy of the letters of MP & CG Unit and NWR Unit, addressed to the CHQ, for the perusal of all Units. All the Unit General Secretaries are requested to go through the letters and to discuss the issue in their Units and shall forward their comments/opinion immediately for necessary action by the CHQ."
Appeal against adopting CAT/Court :
"At this juncture, it is not absolutely acceptable that the issue of correct seniority position of a few delivers back the same pain again to its fellow membership denying the promotion to a whole lot of around 650 officers from all 18 regions of the Tax‐India. I, on behalf of the CHQ and the entire fraternity of ITGOA, appeal before all our members to refrain themselves from seeking resort to the Court of Law for fixation of seniority and thereby barring/delaying the process of promotion in the cadre of ACIT. The ITGOA, with the help of all its members, will ensure that the NRP Judgment is implemented uniformly and as soon as possible all over the country and the review DPCs would be conducted in the ACIT cadre immediately thereafter. But, till such time, the regular DPCs are to be held, for the normal career progression of all our members, and all of us must be restrained from seeking the intervention of the Court of Law."
Click here to view the circular
"But it has to be pointed out that the same tune and texture of harmony has not been prevailing among the entire cross‐section of its members across the country, at least in the issue of implementation of NRP Judgment and the promotions in the cadre of ACIT"
Regarding promotion from ITO to ACIT :
"As per the sanction given by the Hon’ble FM, the proposal for DPC for the R.Y. 2014‐15 was revised and the proposal for promoting 200 officers was sent to UPSC by the CBDT on 10‐12‐2015 which is still pending. Though the CHQ is pursuing the matter on a day‐to‐day basis since then and the O.P.Sinha Committee is putting its best efforts to convince the UPSC for holding the DPC early, I am sorry to say that a series of Court cases filed by our members for immediate revision of the All India Seniority List of ITOs as per the decision of Hon’ble SC in the case of NR Parmar and others, are creating hurdles before the UPSC in declaring the date of DPC."
Regarding Ad-hoc promotion :
"Also, the MP & CG Units has written a letter to the CHQ on 20‐01‐2016 expressing the frustration of its members and requesting the CHQ to impress upon the CBDT for holding DPCs for Ad‐hoc promotion in the cadre of ACIT. The NWR Unit has also expressed the same opinion through its letter dated 25‐01‐2016. Though the CHQ appreciates the sentiment of the members of the MP & CG Unit and the NWR region, and for that matter, the frustration of the entire membership all over the country, the decision of ad‐hoc promotion cannot be taken by the CHQ alone. We are enclosing herewith the copy of the letters of MP & CG Unit and NWR Unit, addressed to the CHQ, for the perusal of all Units. All the Unit General Secretaries are requested to go through the letters and to discuss the issue in their Units and shall forward their comments/opinion immediately for necessary action by the CHQ."
Appeal against adopting CAT/Court :
"At this juncture, it is not absolutely acceptable that the issue of correct seniority position of a few delivers back the same pain again to its fellow membership denying the promotion to a whole lot of around 650 officers from all 18 regions of the Tax‐India. I, on behalf of the CHQ and the entire fraternity of ITGOA, appeal before all our members to refrain themselves from seeking resort to the Court of Law for fixation of seniority and thereby barring/delaying the process of promotion in the cadre of ACIT. The ITGOA, with the help of all its members, will ensure that the NRP Judgment is implemented uniformly and as soon as possible all over the country and the review DPCs would be conducted in the ACIT cadre immediately thereafter. But, till such time, the regular DPCs are to be held, for the normal career progression of all our members, and all of us must be restrained from seeking the intervention of the Court of Law."
Click here to view the circular
41 comments:
Of course, the circular is as expected. It is not known as to why the CHQ of ITGOA is pressing and talking of only NR Parmar decision ( actually it is not a decision but only a clarification of the DOPT OMs as the Hon'ble Supreme Court has not decided the eligibility/seniority on merits) and not the decision in the case of Sri Rajiv Mohan which was decided on merits by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court and subsequently upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the guise of NRP Implementation, many of the Administrative heads have revisited all the OMs, may it be relating to Compassionate Appointments, Intercharge Transfers ... so on, and vast service put in by many of the promotees has been lost, which is causing a loss of faith in the Association itself, which apparently siding the direct recruit Insepctors.
ad hoc promotion can be made only when there is stay by any court,it will be regular subject to updation of seniority.
Why ad hoc.
JCA is silent mode on Rohtas Bhankar case. Friends think and take the decisions because such type of associations are not for us.
I completely agree with the gentleman 8.08pm. mr Rajiv ratan are you listening
As far as Compassionate Appointments are concerned,written consent of spouse is the basic source document required...
Adhoc promotion can be given when some court proceedings are going on and final verdict is awaited.Stay by any court is not a prerequisite for adhoc promotions. The jca can impress on board for adhoc promotion. This will benefit our members who are on the verge of retirement.
Any case filed before CAT/Court on the basis of Hon'ble Supreme Court ordered on Rohtas case for SC/ST employees?
ARE THE CENTRAL LEADERSHIP OF ITGOA LIVING IN FOOLS PARADISE. THEY ARE HARPING ON ONLY NRP WHY NOT RAJIV MOHAN. THE MYOPIC VISION ADOPTED BY CENTRAL LEADERSHIP ANS WELL AS THE REGIONAL CREATED ALL THE MESS IN WHICH ADMINISTRATION IS FISHING NOW.
THE BENEFIT OF NRP HAS BEEN GIVEN BLIND FOLDED WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT THE DR INSPECTORS OF SO CALLED 2005 BATCH COMPRISES CANDIDATES WHO WERE, EARLIER TO SELECTION, EMPLOYED WITH OTHER DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL/STATE GOVT. AND FOR THE SAME THEY HAVE GOT ALL BENEFITS BUT WHEN THEY JOINED THE DEPARTMENT, THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN SENIORITY ANTI DATED. Further as for as the DR of 2005 are concerned the fact of the two situations ie that of facts on the basis of which Hon'ble Supreme case passed its verdict in NRP and the candiadtes being recruited now is different. Furthet the situation of same persons taking seniority at two places is creating a ghost entity. This can be reconciled if the decision of NRP and and Rajiv Mohan are taken into consideration together. But no clear cut stand is being adopted either by the administration or the ITGOA. If the central leader ship is really interested in propagating brotherhood among all the members, it should immediately pursue this matter in right earnest so that this is settled at the earliest.
It is really tragic comment of CHQ on the fact arising out of the issues in NRP. The cat has now come out of the carpet and the leadership is shedding crocodiles tears. Has this earnest and desire been showed at the level of the CHQ when the decision of the NRP was delivered and taken into confidence of all the members and also the inspectors, this situation would not have arisen. The administration is in mood of showing seeds of suspicion in fraternity to fish in troubled water and the leadership of ITGOA is also no different.
Now in the case of all the direct recruit inspectors there are are large number of the persons who were on employment to various central and state govt. wherein they have got seniority increment and other benefits and such candidates have been given seniority from the date final intimation of vacancy to the SSC and thus they are getting seniority at two places and neither the administration is taking any note of discrepancy nor the ITGOA leadership. In such scenario only solution is to seek direction of Supreme Court in view of the decision of NRP and Rajiv Mohan and withdraw the benefits wrongly given to the DRs. Else the days are not far away when ITGOA is vertically divided in two groups. One can not prosper at the cost of other.
Mr BHatttacharya please take note of.
I fully agree with what 8.08 pm told.
In the morning after come out from den, Fox after looking it's own shadow, it felt that he could catch Elephant or big animals for food today. Up to evening, he did not get anything after looking his own shadow, he felt that if I am getting at least a Rat that is enough. THIS IS THE CONDITION OF THE ITGOA NOW.
Adhoc promotion is advisable for ITO to ACIT.
FIRST ENSURE SENIORITY AS PER NRP ONLY THEN TALK ABOUT PROMOTION.........OTHERWISE THERE WILL BE A LOT MORE CAT STAY.
WHAT FOR CHQ AFRAID OF NRP IMPLEMENTATION
Everybody wants nrp implementation, but the fact remains that it will take a whole lot of time. We members should not debate on whether parmar or rajiv mohan is to implemented but should think about those poor members who are in dpc list and are retiring in next two months. Seniority can be revised later with or without parmar, but denying the legitimate right of promotion to members is surely bad in law. People who are opposing dpc by moving to cat should put themselves in the position of those members who are retiring every month in the hope that one day they will retire as acit. Members who are making hue and cry of nrp implementation and have moved to court will surely repent one day or other in their tenure for spoiling the carrer prospects of retiring members. Jaisi karni waisi bharni
First file the representation to implement the constitutional bench judgment in the case of Rohtas Bhankar. If the department not reply your representation than file the case before CAT. Do not delay.
catch up rule should be implemented
ITEF/ITGOA of West Bengal- Cudos to them for doing nothing : Inspectors of West Bengal region who were promoted way back in 2011 & 2012, but as per NRP seniority list of West Bengal ( which had been published & uploaded online ) who have now come in ranking below Inspectors who are yet to be promoted to the post of ITOs becoz of falsified gradation list prepared in the past by certain self interested knowledgeable authorities still keep holding the post of ITOs above Inspectors who as per the published gradation list from the Office of by the Pr.CCIT/West Bengal are in rank below the non-promoted Inspectors in spite of the senior ( as per the gradation list published )having written to the concerned authority,i.e. the Pr.CCIT/West Bengal & Sikkim Region to rectify their grievance.
It is therefore requested of the CBDT, if any of their members are seeing this message not to give a single promotion from the post of ITO to ACIT until and unless West Bengal provides the rectified seniority list of ITOs upto the recruitment year 2015-16.
Please think about retiring Senior ITOs. Adhoc ACIT promotion can be made for their sake as done in the case of CCIT.
This SG of itgoa appears to be an illegitimate son of nrp.
This stupid fellow SG cum MTS of itgoa talks about his father only what about other honourable supreme Court decision implementation? Will this SG's grandfather reply.
Stupid chap
Leaders reply of 28.1.16 at 8.52 PM.
It is shame on the part of ITGOA, Our Board as well as DOPT. Why because ITGOA is only for NRP and other supreme court cases are ignored. What interest ITGOA has we dont know. Our Board issues circulars etc., blindly basing on DOPT communication. DOPT has two set of Rules one for the IT Department and other set of rules for all the other departments, though the same examination is conducted by SSC. Further, NRP judgement never speaks about revisiting the seniority right from 1986. It is realy shame. Shame! Shame! Shame!
Leaders of ITSEWA this is the opportunity to you to take up the issue of implementation of Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Rohtas Bhankhar. Also intimate to the commission of SC/ST that the all the department has not give the effect to the Said judgment.
The ITSEWA is always sleeping on the bed of JCA for some benefits incl
In that situations an appeal can be filed before the CAT.
These selfish itgoa so called leader have no reply except to dream of becoming promotee cit oneday
Bhaskar jo kar le lekin ACIT ka promotion bina NRP ka nahi hoga. Kuchh dino me aur case karne wale hai. Rok sako to rok lo
It's a big shame. How shameless are people who raise issues regarding SC ST despite knowing the fact that reservation in promotion is 100 % against the principle of natural justice. Shame Shame Shame!!!!!!!
Please go through the comments posted by the GUJJU COMRADE in response to the post dated 24th January, 2016, Sunday.
I think what is said if its true then the responsible persons should be taken to task for purposefully misguiding the Board and Administration.
What about rajeev mohan judgement implentation? It is also a supreme Court decision
It is shameful that people from gujrat who have stalled dpc for quite a long time by moving to cat are themselves entangled in fraudulent implementation of n r parmar. Now the issue is that the seniority list off all the zones will be scrutinised by the board which will take a hell lot of time. Will bhaskar able to deliver his assurance of conducting dpc by march 2016. It will be a herculean task in the present circumstances. Or a middle path could be adopted by adhoc promotions which also seems to be next to impossible in the near future. The carrer prospects of thousands of members have been crucified by the ill doings of gujrat people for which they will repent one day.
it is self made things, some comrades do not want the implementation of Hon`ble SC because it is their defeat slap on their adjustments. How a country or department can progress where people made cheap adjustments to promote their own people, where people fight to be declared as backward. Come on wake up and do the needful in right way and right direction.
One side vacancies are pending to be filled up..on the other side many senior Inspectors passed ITO exam,2015 and waiting for their turn to become ITOs after March,2016..It means never ending wait for those already in line...very bad situation..
My dear 1.31PM, Which is shame? We do not want to birth as SC/ST. Whether we decide our berth as well as our Constitution? We want to implement the Hon'ble SC orders on Rohtas case as same as NRP. Do you know the order date i.e.15.07.2014. Why it is not effected after passing 19 months so far? Do not say Shame!!!
Gujrat is famous for cheats?
Being a left minded person the head of CHQ whose tactics has always been to speak not truth but pretended to speak truth always favour direct recruit Inspector for his vested interest . Whatever he says these days are only to be fooling comrades. Nothing has so far been achieved by Mr. Bhattacharjee being as President of ITGOA of WB and PAN India he will never do such in furthur because of his step brotherly attitude.
Bhaskar bhattacharya has given a lolipop in the hands of the members by circulating a 11 page letter addressed to gs/president of all zones. In the said letter he expressed his inabilities to impress on upsc to conduct dpc due to petition filed in principal cat. It is noteworthy that the board has already directed all pr.ccit (cca) to vacate any stay/ file writ petition against any stay by cat on dpc for2014-15.The point to be noted is that why the CHQ is not pursuing the Pr.ccit (cca) delhi to vacate the petition filed by gujrat member mr.ratnoo in principal cat. It has been over a month that 2014-15 list is lying with upsc. As learned from sources there is no follow up from the CHQ . It is waiting for just that time barring assessment concludes by 31 march and then by may/ june it will again play dirty politics by starting fresh agitation again to befool its
members.
Fully support and Agreed with 1 feb 2016 at 8.06 PM.
due to differences with some group you don't have right to say all GUJARAT IS CHEAT.
Promotions should be made on the basis of merit and not seniority. That's the only way out of this never ending litigations. An exam should be introduced for ACIT promotions and should be taken along with performance review.
agree with February 2, 2016 at 2:16 PM with small ammendment that give the promotions of ITO on the basis of seniority as well as date of passing of ITO's Exam so that some officials those who have passed ITO's exam ten years ago with 60% passing will get justice.
Post a Comment